I have been reading a very engaging and provocative book by Richard Rohr recently, entitled The Naked Now. It is subtitled "Learning to See as the Mystics See," and has provided much food for thought. The dense ideas contained within have caused me to read and reread and reread again many of the chapters in an attempt to begin to understand what he's actually saying. While I'm sure I haven't grasped more than a fraction of what he's saying yet, here are the main messages I am drawing from the book.
Authentic Christian faith is NOT about adhering to a correct set of dogmas, principles or beliefs about God. That is a very dualistic, either-or, win-lose approach to seeing the world, and unfortunately, Western Christendom has fallen into this very trap as much as anyone else. The church tells people what to know more than how to know, what to see rather than how to see.
What Rohr is challenging us to is a nondualistic way of seeing the world, of opening ourselves to being open to experiences, of being willing to hold unresolved tensions within ourselves without needing to find immediate solutions, and to weigh positive and negative consequences without rushing to label, analyze, or judge the "wrong" or "perfect" answer. He calls us to let go our need for control.
I particularly liked what he said about how we transfer our own either-or mentality onto God. This is what he referred to as "the two heels of a Christian Achilles":
1. The individual Christian is told to love unconditionally, but the God who commands this is depicted as having a very conditional and quite exclusive love himself or herself! The believer is told to love his enemies, but "God" clearly does not; in fact, God punishes them for all eternity. This stifles and paralyzes many believers at the conscious or unconscious level, and it should. Such a message will not save the world and surely will not produce many great or loving people. The many loving Christians I have met in my life usually have had at least one unconditionally loving parent or friend along the way, and God was then able to second the motion. There are remarkable exceptions to this, however. I have met a few humanly unloved people whose need for divine love was so great that they surrendered to it--utterly. The Gospel worked for them.
2. Under the message that most of us have heard, we end up being more loving than God, and then not taking God very seriously. Even my less-than-saintly friends, the ordinary Joes on the block, would usually give a guy a break, overlook some mistakes, and even on their worst days would not imagine torturing people who do not like them, worship them, or believe in them. "God" ends up looking rather petty, needy, narcissistic, and easily offended. God's offended justice is clearly much stronger than God's mercy, it seems. Why would anyone trust or love such a God, or want to be alone with Him or Her? Much less spend eternity with such a Being? I wouldn't. We must come to recognize that this perspective, conscious or unconscious, is at the basis of much agnosticism and atheism in the West today.
He describes Jesus call to repent as really a call to change: to have the humility to keep growing and changing throughout our lives. Love and suffering are the two paths by which our inner defenses must be broken down to enable us to open ourselves to nonpolarity thinking, to die to our old selves and open up in new ways to new understandings and ways of knowing.
I have been through a range of emotions today, both joy at some of the ways I feel God is speaking to me through Rohr, and also anger at current world politics--both the way I think the current British government is causing great injustice by forcing the poorest people in Britain (through massive cutbacks of social services and unfair taxation) to pay for the economic problems brought about by the richest members of the population, as well as the whole situation in Libya, and confusion at what a faithful response to such situations might look like.
I think if I read Rohr correctly, it is I who need to be changed: to forgive myself for the ways in which I am complicit in the structural injustices in our world, and to seek to live more justly on a personal level in whatever ways I can.